data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebdd6/ebdd6eec863223fb14eb0ccb1837a77c970c6f10" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d012/4d012a1d42e8f2ad47b7d73cbff2ae1f36766cd2" alt=""
Figure 2 shows the only configuration in which forces can be zero at all three charge locations. Namely, all three charges are collinear and charge q3 is in between charges q1 and q2.
Now let us suppose that q3 is located at a distance x from q1 and that the distance between charges q1 and q2 is d. This is shown in Figure 3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa1ee/aa1eea2f48dc224712dc731166abcd6fc1d540fa" alt=""
Since the forces acting on the three charges must be zero and q3 is a negative charge we have,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a0c6/6a0c626ee3838c561ed7f443181ea054cc1f42e5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cce94/cce942c43b0cc097d1da8a86809c0daceb5c0c38" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04342/043427ed43d683c3acd2c7fe17efd9819af1aedc" alt=""
It is immediately evident that (3) is redundant since it can be derived from (1) and (2). From (1) and (2) we obtain,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e4a/76e4a758e4f314227a05a708faacac8ef2b50d34" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7784/c778499d4df5e85bef1d70841defa4e875a8ea9d" alt=""
In other words, the position of charge q3 divides the line joining charges q1 and q2 into segments of ratio
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeb08/aeb08e3c1406272723a892fba56a302f9133c401" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f417/8f417dcded2df948af474a98896ba276d67db369" alt=""
From (4) and (1) we also obtain the value of change q3 as,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ca8a/3ca8a7e0e65dbb67529c33fb3a942235c4737453" alt=""
Wrong answer. Please verify with the answer given in the book.
ReplyDeleteSecond last step is wrong, the formula used should be
ReplyDeleter3 = [root(q1) r2 + root(q2) r1] / root(q1) + root(q2),
Remember it is
x = [ m1x2 + m2x1] / m1 + m2
not
x = [m1x1 + m2x2 ] / m1 + m2
Wtf
Delete